The University of Georgia College of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences
Cooperative Extension Service


1998 Tobacco Variety Information

J. Michael Moore, Paul Bertrand, Michael G. Stephenson, Steve LaHue

 

New Varieties for 1999

RGH12 developed by R. G. Seed Company with moderate levels of black shank and Granville wilt resistance and resistance to root-knot nematodes. It is a hybrid and is an early variety in terms of leaf ripening rate with excellent curability. It yields above average.

Growers are encouraged to plant only a limited acreage of any new variety until more information and experience becomes available from a wider range of soil and climatic conditions.

 

Variety Selection

All tobacco varieties undergo rigorous testing before being released for commercial production. This testing includes small plot trials on experiment stations, warehouse evaluations, determination of chemical and physical properties, and finally on-farm testing to evaluate how the potential variety performs in a commercial situation. A variety must meet certain quality standards before being released. Thus farmers can be assured that any variety that is released has been thoroughly evaluated before seed are made available for commercial planting.

Each farmer may have different requirements for the variety to be grown on his farm. Ease of growing and curing, disease and nematode resistance and market acceptance should be taken into account when selecting a variety. Since disease and nematode infestations on a farm can seriously limit variety selection, farmers should attempt to keep their fields free of these problems. Crop rotation is necessary on most farms to reduce losses from soil-borne diseases and nematodes.

Growers should not depend solely on varietal resistance to prevent losses from diseases and nematodes. Crop rotations and appropriate chemicals should be a part of every tobacco program no matter which variety is grown. In severely infested fields, there will usually be some loss to black shank with any variety. Chemicals are available to reduce black shank damage. Three year or longer crop rotation is a proven means of reducing black shank losses. Rotation among a group of black shank resistant varieties will prolong resistance of any one variety. This practice is most valuable where crop rotations are shortest. Nematode-resistant varieties have resistance only to races 1 and 3 of Southern root-knot nematode. Losses to peanut, Javanese and race 2 or 4 of Southern root-knot nematodes have been increased by short-term rotations, growing varieties resistant to races 1 and 3 of Southern root-knot nematode and improper use of nematicides. Rotating tobacco with nematode-resistant crops and effective use of nematicides are essential to preventing losses to nematodes.

Several agronomic characteristics may assist in the selection of a variety. Yield, quality, suckering habits, height, leaf spacing, leaf size and maturity characteristics are available. Some of these characteristics may be more affected by cultural practices than by varietal differences.

1998 Official Flue-Cured Variety Test

Tobacco varieties play a discerning role in yield and quality improvement programs. Moreover, a vital part of any breeding program is the appropriate testing and evaluation of new tobacco varieties. Important characteristics of these varieties are yield, disease resistance, desirable plant qualities, ease of handling and market acceptability. For a variety to be recommended it must be superlative in one or more and contain a balance of the remainder of the factors. For instance, for a variety to have an excellent yield and poor disease resistance or to yield well and have poor cured quality is undesirable.

The Regional Variety Test is conducted to obtain data on yield, disease resistance, quality as judged by physical appearance, and chemical analysis for quality characteristics. Once this information is analyzed, the desirable varieties and breeding lines in these tests advance to the Official Variety Test for further evaluation under growing and marketing conditions in Georgia.

As of last year we have included a few breeder's lines for evaluation. This data has two major uses. First, the breeders are made aware of Georgia's growing conditions. Secondly, extension personnel and growers are able to compare these developing materials to released varieties. All varieties which are not released have an asterisk by them. In addition, we have included the Regional Farm Test so that when varieties are selected from this test the extension service will have a second data set to use in making recommendations to growers.

The 1998 Official Variety Test and Regional Farm Test consisted of 40 entries and 14 entries respectively. These tests were conducted at the University of Georgia Bowen Farm on an Ocilla loamy coarse sand. Each entry was mechanically transplanted on March 25 with 20 plants per field plot and replicated three times. Fertilization consisted of 500 lbs/acre of 6-6-18 prior to transplanting and an application of 500 lbs/acre of 6-6-18 at cultivation with an additional 120 lbs/acre of 16-0-0 added as nitrate of soda.

Cultural practices, harvesting, and curing procedures were uniformly applied and followed the current University of Georgia recommendations. Data collected included yield in lbs/A, value/A in dollars, dollars per hundred weight, grade index, number of leaves/plant, plant height in inches, and days to flower. The chemical determinations consisted of total alkaloids, total soluble sugars, and the ratio of sugar to total alkaloids.

Yields (Table 1.) were average ranging from 1982 lbs/A for NC 2326 to 3667 lbs/A for K 326. The breeder's lines ranged from 2747 lbs/A for RG H61 to 3688 lbs/A for OX 414NF. Dollars per acre followed the same trend with NC 2326 at $3218/A and K 326 at $6376/A. The breeder's lines yielded $4569/A for RG H61 and a high of $6322/A for Speight 212 even though it yielded slightly less than OX 414NF. Grade indices were fairly good, ranging from 30 for NC 95 to 78 for Speight 210(unreleased). Leaf number and plant height were about normal for all entries with 30" to 36" heights and 18 leaves being the average. The spread for price per CWT ranged from $148 per CWT for NC 95 to $176 per CWT for Speight 209. The state average for 1998 was $170 per CWT and this test had 24 entries 1 to 8 dollars above and 16 entries 1 to22 dollars below with the test mean equal to the state average. Agronomic results from the 1998 Official Variety Test are summarized in Tables 1. and 2.

The Regional Farm Test is summarized in Table 3. In this test, none of the entries out weighed the NC 95 check significantly though RG 5H17 yielded 3715lbs/A as compared to 3075lbs/A for NC 95. Dollars per acre followed the same trend with NC 95 at $4715/A and RG 5H17 at $6226/A. The spread for price per CWT ranged from $154 per CWT for NC 95 to $173 per CWT for OX 6069. All entries were below the state average of $170 per CWTwith the exception of NCTG 100($172) and OX 6069($173). OX 6069 also had the highest grade index at 67 with NC 95 the lowest at 33. Leaf number and plant height were within normal ranges. Chemistry followed the same trend as the Official Variety Test.

 

 

Table 1. Yield, Value, Price Index, Grade Index and Agronomic Characteristics of Released Varieties Evaluated in the 1998 Official Flue-Cured Variety Test at the University of Georgia, Tifton, GA.

 

Variety

Yield

lb/A

Value

$/A

Price1

Index

$/CWT

Grade2

Index

Number

Leaves/

Plant

Plant

Ht.

(inch)

Days

to

Flower

%

Total

Alkaloids

%

Reducing

Sugars

Ratio

RS/TA

NC 2326

1982

3218

162

43

15

32

62

NC 95

3136

4641

148

30

17

35

62

K326

3667

6376

174

66

18

33

81

3.48

9.6

2.76

Coker 371 Gold

2996

5230

175

67

16

32

76

4.47

8.4

1.88

K 149

2986

5007

168

56

17

32

80

3.89

7.1

1.83

K 346

2843

4835

170

54

18

35

81

4.17

9.0

2.16

K 394

3519

6205

176

68

18

33

81

3.55

14.8

4.17

K 730

2975

5124

172

59

18

33

81

3.78

12.0

3.17

K 399

3429

5760

167

52

19

34

81

3.84

9.3

2.42

K 358

3144

5287

168

51

17

32

64

3.47

10.1

2.91

NC 71

3335

56657

170

54

18

32

80

3.69

11.3

3.06

NC 72

3329

5802

174

65

18

34

68

3.46

11.1

3.21

NC 55

3329

5619

169

49

20

33

81

3.99

8.5

2.13

OX 207

3360

5829

174

61

18

34

78

3.55

14.5

4.08

RG 17

3450

6052

176

70

19

33

78

3.60

10.5

2.92

RG 11

3297

5560

168

55

18

34

76

4.28

9.3

2.17

RG 22

3403

5886

173

64

18

32

78

3.80

10.3

2.71

RG 81

3006

5091

169

53

17

32

79

4.14

8.5

2.05

RG H4

3022

4995

165

44

17

32

78

4.63

8.9

2.76

 

Table 1. Yield, Value, Price Index, Grade Index and Agronomic Characteristics of Released Varieties Evaluated in the 1998 Official Flue-Cured Variety Test at the University of Georgia, Tifton, GA (Continued).

 

Variety

Yield

lb/A

Value

$/A

Price1

Index

$/CWT

Grade2

Index

Number

Leaves/

Plant

Plant

Ht.

(inch)

Days

to

Flower

%

Total

Alkaloids

%

Reducing

Sugars

Ratio

RS/TA

Speight G-70

2821

4655

165

45

16

32

68

3.48

13.7

3.94

Speight G-117

3025

5185

171

56

18

34

70

4.29

8.0

1.86

Speight G-126

2891

4953

172

70

17

33

79

3.94

11.1

2.82

Speight NF3

3102

5455

176

74

19

34

77

3.70

9.5

2.57

Speight 168

3345

5744

172

61

18

33

77

3.81

11.9

3.12

Speight 172

3012

4803

158

56

18

33

77

4.52

6.6

1.46

Speight 178

3588

6302

175

66

18

31

80

4.08

10.4

2.55

Speight 179

3039

5089

167

52

17

32

81

4.46

7.9

1.77

Speight 206*

3303

5635

171

57

18

34

80

3.63

10.1

2.78

Speight 208*

2980

5156

173

59

18

34

80

4.12

9.2

2.23

Speight 209*

3557

6260

176

69

16

33

72

3.26

11.0

3.37

Speight 210*

3356

5982

178

78

17

32

71

4.07

10.4

2.56

Speight 211*

3234

5617

174

61

17

33

79

3.20

12.5

3.91

Speight 212*

3625

6323

173

62

19

30

79

3.45

13.1

3.80

RG H61

2748

4569

166

55

16

32

82

4.06

8.9

2.19

RG H12

2949

5027

171

54

17

33

68

4.05

8.8

2.17

GL 939

2859

4962

173

64

17

32

66

3.47

12.0

3.46

OX 414NF

3689

5981

160

54

19

35

NF

3.07

11.8

3.84

RG 7H13*

3588

6233

174

63

17

36

69

3.53

11.5

3.26

 

Table 1. Yield, Value, Price Index, Grade Index and Agronomic Characteristics of Released Varieties Evaluated in the 1998 Official Flue-Cured Variety Test at the University of Georgia, Tifton, GA (Continued).

 

Variety

Yield

lb/A

Value

$/A

Price1

Index

$/CWT

Grade2

Index

Number

Leaves/

Plant

Plant

Ht.

(inch)

Days

to

Flower

%

Total

Alkaloids

%

Reducing

Sugars

Ratio

RS/TA

RG 7H5 *

3128

5195

166

57

17

33

67

3.80

9.8

2.58

RG 7G13*

3192

5274

165

45

17

34

79

4.54

7.9

1.74

RG 7G57*

3588

5625

157

51

18

33

78

3.98

10.8

2.71

LSD

694.6

1334.8

13.2

18.2

 

1Price Index based on two year average (1997-1998) prices for U.S. government grades.
2Numerical values ranging from 1-99 for flue-cured tobacco based on equivalent government grades - higher the number, higher the grade.
* Unreleased Variety



Table 2. Comparison of Certain Characteristics for Released Varieties Evaluated in the 1998 Official Flue-Cured Tobacco Variety Test at the University of Georgia, Tifton, GA.

Variety

Yield

lb/A

Value

$/A

Price1 Index

$/CWT

Grade2

Index

Number Leaves/

Plant

Plant Height

inches

Days to

Flower

-----------------------Three Year Average 1996-1998-----------------------------------

NC 2326

2158

3423

164

46

16

35

76

NC 95

2451

3896

160

43

17

35

77

K 326

3179

5584

175

67

18

34

85

Coker 371 Gold

2398

4187

174

66

17

33

80

Speight G 70

2658

4559

171

53

17

34

80

K 346

2415

4076

166

56

18

35

86

K 394

2805

4901

174

63

17

34

84

K 149

2578

4442.2

4442

172

61

19

35

83

RG 11

2699

4667

173

63

17

35

83

Speight G 126

2531

4376

173

64

18

36

86

Speight G 117

2567

4440

172

57

19

35

81

RG H4

2699

4619

171

58

17

34

84

K 730

2696

4688

174

61

18

34

83

RG 81

2790

5036

173

64

18

34

86

OX 207

2913

4481

173

60

18

34

84

NC 71

3069

5309

173

61

18

34

83

 

Variety

Yield

lb/A

Value

$/A

Price1 Index

$/CWT

Grade2

Index

Number Leaves/

Plant

Plant Height

(inches)

Days to

Flower

-----------------------Three Year Average 1996-1998-----------------------------------

RG 22

2690

4675

173

65

18

34

81

------------------------Two Year Average 1997-1998-----------------------------------

NC 2326

2019

3263

162

39

15

34

72

NC 95

2582

3999

156

34

16

34

73

K 326

3362

5866

174

67

18

33

85

Coker 371 Gold

2576

4479

174

66

16

33

80

Speight G 70

2894

4914

169

50

16

33

78

K 346

2524

4286

169

54

18

35

85

K 394

2941

5131

173

64

17

32

84

K 149

2827

4824

170

59

18

34

84

RG 11

2862

4880

170

61

17

34

82

Speight G 126

2612

4477

171

64

18

34

84

Speight G 117

2653

4544

171

55

18

34

79

RG H4

2699

4539

168

53

16

32

84

K 730

2901

5012

172

58

16

32

82

RG 81

2730

4677

171

61

17

32

84

 

 

Variety

Yield

lb/A

Value

$/A

Price1

Index

$/CWT

Grade2

Index

Number

Leaves/

Plant

Plant

Height

(inches)

Days

to

Flower

------------------------Two Year Average 1997-1998-----------------------------------

OX 207

2758

4760

173

58

18

33

84

NC 71

3390

5810

171

56

18

34

82

RG 22

2923

5059

173

66

18

35

81

GL 939

2776

4829

174

63

18

34

75

NC 55

3068

5269

172

57

19

31

83

NC 72

2918

5066

173

62

18

35

76

Speight NF3

2506

4330

172

63

19

35

83

Speight 172

2719

4520

166

61

19

34

83

Conducted on an Ocilla loamy sand soil fertilized with 1000 lbs of 6-6-18 and plants spaced 20-21 inches in 44-inch rows.
1Price Index based on two-year average (1997-1998) prices for U.S. government grades.
2Numerical values ranging from 1-99 for flue-cured tobacco based on equivalent grades - higher the number, higher the grade.
Researched by Stevan S. LaHue and M. G. Stephenson, under project S1-71 and supported by grants from the Georgia Tobacco Commission.

 

Table 3. Comparison of Certain Characteristics for Varieties Evaluated in the 1998 Regional Farm Flue Cured Tobacco Variety Test at the University of Georgia, Tifton, GA.

 

Variety

Yield

lb/A

Value

$/A

Price1

Index

$/CWT

Grade2

Index

Number

Leaves/

Plant

Plant

Height

(inches)

Days

to

Flower

%

Total

Alkaloids

%

Reducing

Sugars

Ratio

RS/TA

NC 2326

2394

3840

160

37

18

35

62

4.6

7.6

1.65

NC 95

3076

4715

154

34

18

36

72

4.4

9.7

2.20

CU 468

3192

5237

163

40

18

34

72

4.1

11.6

2.84

PV H03

3165

5291

168

45

17

35

68

3.7

7.5

2.04

NC TG 97

2782

4650

167

47

19

34

81

3.8

8.4

2.22

NC TG 100

3202

5507

172

64

19

34

72

3.5

10.9

3.09

PV H09

2928

4778

163

43

18

36

68

4.4

5.1

1.17

RG 4H217

2801

4683

167

47

17

32

63

3.5

8.9

2.57

RG 5H17

3715

6227

168

48

20

36

64

3.8

8.1

2.09

Speight 196

2600

4298

165

48

17

35

70

3.9

9.8

2.46

OX 6069

3467

6021

173

67

19

34

80

4.3

10.1

2.34

Speight 190

3657

6102

167

49

19

35

80

4.2

7.7

1.86

PV H08

3604

6071

168

51

18

35

68

4.3

11.1

2.59

CU 561

3271

5375

164

40

18

39

74

3.8

10.6

2.77

LSD -0.05

978.5

1673.4

7.1

14.9



Table 4. Disease Resistance of Selected Released Tobacco Varieties
Variety

Black Shank

Granville Wilt

Southern Root-Knot Nematode

Tobacco

Mosaic Virus

Coker 319

L

L

S

S

Coker 371 Gold

H

M

S

S

CU 263

L

L

RES

S

GL 939

L-M

H

RES

S

K 149

M

H

RES

S

K 326

L

M

RES

S

K 340

M

M

S

S

K 346

M

M

RES

S

K 358

L

H

RES

S

K 394

M

L

S

S

K 399

M

H

RES

S

K 730

L

H

RES

S

McNair 944

M

L

S

S

NC 27 NF

L

L

RES

S

NC 37 NF

L

L

RES

S

NC 55

L

L

RES

S (PVY, Etch)

NC 60

M-H

M

RES

S

NC 71

H

M

RES

S

NC 72

H

L

RES

S

NC 82

M

M

S

S

NC 95

L

H

RES

S

NC 567

L

L

RES (Cyst)

RES

NC 729

L

L

S

S

NC 2326

L

L

S

S

OX 207

H

H

RES

S

OX 940

M-H

M

S

S

RG 11

L

M

RES

S

RG 17

L

M

RES

S

RG 22

L

M

RES

S

RG 81

L

L

RES

S

RGH 4

M

H

RES

RES

RGH12

M

M

RES

S

RGH 61

M

L

RES

S

Speight G-28

M

M

RES

S

Speight G-70

M

M

RES

S

Speight G-108

M

M

RES

S

Speight G-102

M

L

RES

S

Speight G-111

M

M

RES

S

Speight G-117

L-M

L-M

RES

S

Speight G-126

M

M

RES

S

Speight G-168

H

H

RES

S

Speight G-172

H

M

RES

S

Speight G-178

L

H

RES

S

Speight G-179

H

H

RES

S

Speight G-NF3

H

H

RES

S

1 L = Low to no resistance; M = Moderate to fair resistance; H = High resistance.

2 RES = Resistant; S = Susceptible; ? = Specific Resistance Not Determined

FUSARIUM WILT There appears to be a great variation among varieties to Fusarium wilt.

However, we do not have sufficient data to make recommendations. Root-knot nematode resistant varieties may help in that root-knot tends to increase Fusarium Wilt.

 

Table 5. Yield, Grade Index, Price Index and Value per Acre of the 1997-1998 Newly Available Varieties, CPES, Bowen Farm, Tifton.
Variety

Yield

Grade Index1

Price

Index2

Value

lb/A

1-99

$/lb

$/A

GL 939

2859

64

1.73

4962

NC 71

3335

54

1.70

5665

NC 72

3329

65

1.74

5802

OX 207

3360

61

1.74

5829

RGH 12

2949

54

1.71

5027

Speight 168

3345

61

1.72

5744

Speight 172

3012

56

1.72

5744

Speight 178

3588

66

1.75

6302

Speight 179

3039

52

1.67

5089

Speight NF3

3102

74

1.76

5455

K 326

3667

66

1.74

6376

1 Grade Index is a numerical value ranging from 1-99 for flue-cured tobacco based on equivalent grades - the higher the number, the higher the grade.
2 Price Index is based on a two-year floating average (1997-1998) prices for U.S. government grades.

 

Table 6. Disease Resistance of Newly Released Tobacco Varieties
Variety

Black Shank

Granville Wilt

Southern Root-Knot Nematode

Tobacco Mosaic Virus

GL 939

M

H

RES

S

NC 71

H

M

RES

S

NC 72

H

L

RES

S

OX 207

H

H

RES

S

RG 81

L

L

RES

S

Speight 168

H

H

RES

S

Speight 172

H

M

RES

S

Speight 178

L

H

RES

S

Speight 179

H

H

RES

S

Speight NF3

M

H

RES

S

1 L = Low to no resistance; M = Moderate to fair resistance; H = High resistance.

2 RES = Resistant; S = Susceptible; ? = Specific Resistance Not Determined.

Fusarium Wilt: There appears to be a great variation among varieties to Fusarium wilt. However, we do not have sufficient data to make recommendations. Root-knot nematode resistant varieties may help in that root-knot tends to increase Fusarium wilt.

 

 

 

Table 7. Pedigree, Year of Release and Sponsor of Selected Varieties.
Variety

Yr Rel.

 

 

Pedigree Sponsor
Coker 371 Gold

1986

(G-28X354) X (CB139XF-105)(G-28X34) X NC82

GL

GL 939

1992

McNair 926 X 80241

[G-28X354])McNair 399

GL

K 149

1988

([G-28X354] X [CB-139XF-105] X [G-28X354])McNair 399

GL

K 326

1981

McNair 225(McNair30 X NC95)

GL

K 346

1988

McNair 926 X 80241

GL

K 358

1987

McNair 926 X 80241

GL

K 730

1989

McNair 926 X 80241

GL

K 394

1983

Speight G-28 X McNair 944

GL

K 399

1979

(C-139 X C-319) X NC 95

GL

NC 27 NF

1985

(C-319 X NC TG-21) X C-319

NC

NC 37 NF

1987

(C-319 X NC TG-21) X NC 82

NC

NC 55

1994

(K 326 X DH 1220) X (K 326 X Coker 371 Gold

NC/GL

NC 60

1985

McNair 944 X Speight G-28

NC

NC 71

1995

F1 Hybrid

NC/RK

NC 72

1996

F1 Hybrid

NC/RK

NC 82

1978

6129 X C-319

NC

NC 95

1961

(C-139 X Bel.4-30) X (C-139XHicks)

NC

NC 2326

1965

(Hicks X 9102)(Hicks)Hicks)Hicks)

NC

OX 207

1995

Coker 219 X K 399

OX

OX 940

1992

(G-28 X Coker 347) X Coker 48

OX

RG 11

1991

NC 50 X K 399

RG

RG 17

1993

K 326 X K 399

RG

RG 22

1990

McNair 373 X Coker 51

RG

RG 81

1994

K 326 X K 399

RG

RG 89

1992

K 326 X Coker 319 X Coker 411

RG

RGH 4

1994

Hybrid

RG

RGH 12

1999

Hybrid

RG

RGH 61

1995

F1 Hybrid

RG

Speight G-70

1978

C-258 X VA 115 X G-10

SPT

Speight G-108

1986

G-70 X G-28

SPT

Speight G-111

1991

G-85 X G-14

SPT

Speight G-117

1990

C-176 X G-102

SPT

Speight G-126

1992

K 326 X G-96

SPT

Speight G-168

1996

Coker 371G X Spt G 118

SPT

Speight G-172

1996

Coker 371G X Spt G 126

SPT

Speight G-178

1997

RG8 X G117

SPT

Speight G-179

1997

C371G X SPG-28

SPT

Speight G-NF3

1996

Speight NF 1 X NC 0007

SPT

VA 116

1989

NC 82 X C-319

VA

GL

NC

OX

RK

Gold Leaf Seed Co.

N.C. Agric. Research Service

N.C. Agric. Res. Service (Oxford)

F. W. Rikard Seeds

RG

SPT

VA

R. G. Seed Company

Speight Seed Farms

Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State

University

 



The University of Georgia and Ft. Valley State College, the U.S. Department of Agriculture and counties of the state cooperating. The Cooperative Extension Service offers educational programs, assistance and materials to all people without regard to race, color, national origin, age, sex or disability.

An Equal Opportunity Employer/Affirmative Action Organization Committed to a Diverse Work Force

Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 18 and June 30, 1914, The University of Georgia College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences and the U.S. Department of Agriculture cooperating.

Gale A. Buchanan, Dean and Director