J. Michael Moore, Paul Bertrand, Michael G. Stephenson, Steve LaHue
| RGH12 | developed by R. G. Seed Company with moderate levels of black shank and Granville wilt resistance and resistance to root-knot nematodes. It is a hybrid and is an early variety in terms of leaf ripening rate with excellent curability. It yields above average. |
Growers are encouraged to plant only a limited acreage of any new variety until more information and experience becomes available from a wider range of soil and climatic conditions.
All tobacco varieties undergo rigorous testing before being released for commercial production. This testing includes small plot trials on experiment stations, warehouse evaluations, determination of chemical and physical properties, and finally on-farm testing to evaluate how the potential variety performs in a commercial situation. A variety must meet certain quality standards before being released. Thus farmers can be assured that any variety that is released has been thoroughly evaluated before seed are made available for commercial planting.
Each farmer may have different requirements for the variety to be grown on his farm. Ease of growing and curing, disease and nematode resistance and market acceptance should be taken into account when selecting a variety. Since disease and nematode infestations on a farm can seriously limit variety selection, farmers should attempt to keep their fields free of these problems. Crop rotation is necessary on most farms to reduce losses from soil-borne diseases and nematodes.
Growers should not depend solely on varietal resistance to prevent losses from diseases and nematodes. Crop rotations and appropriate chemicals should be a part of every tobacco program no matter which variety is grown. In severely infested fields, there will usually be some loss to black shank with any variety. Chemicals are available to reduce black shank damage. Three year or longer crop rotation is a proven means of reducing black shank losses. Rotation among a group of black shank resistant varieties will prolong resistance of any one variety. This practice is most valuable where crop rotations are shortest. Nematode-resistant varieties have resistance only to races 1 and 3 of Southern root-knot nematode. Losses to peanut, Javanese and race 2 or 4 of Southern root-knot nematodes have been increased by short-term rotations, growing varieties resistant to races 1 and 3 of Southern root-knot nematode and improper use of nematicides. Rotating tobacco with nematode-resistant crops and effective use of nematicides are essential to preventing losses to nematodes.
Several agronomic characteristics may assist in the selection of a variety. Yield, quality, suckering habits, height, leaf spacing, leaf size and maturity characteristics are available. Some of these characteristics may be more affected by cultural practices than by varietal differences.
Tobacco varieties play a discerning role in yield and quality improvement programs. Moreover, a vital part of any breeding program is the appropriate testing and evaluation of new tobacco varieties. Important characteristics of these varieties are yield, disease resistance, desirable plant qualities, ease of handling and market acceptability. For a variety to be recommended it must be superlative in one or more and contain a balance of the remainder of the factors. For instance, for a variety to have an excellent yield and poor disease resistance or to yield well and have poor cured quality is undesirable.
The Regional Variety Test is conducted to obtain data on yield, disease resistance, quality as judged by physical appearance, and chemical analysis for quality characteristics. Once this information is analyzed, the desirable varieties and breeding lines in these tests advance to the Official Variety Test for further evaluation under growing and marketing conditions in Georgia.
As of last year we have included a few breeder's lines for evaluation. This data has two major uses. First, the breeders are made aware of Georgia's growing conditions. Secondly, extension personnel and growers are able to compare these developing materials to released varieties. All varieties which are not released have an asterisk by them. In addition, we have included the Regional Farm Test so that when varieties are selected from this test the extension service will have a second data set to use in making recommendations to growers.
The 1998 Official Variety Test and Regional Farm Test consisted of 40 entries and 14 entries respectively. These tests were conducted at the University of Georgia Bowen Farm on an Ocilla loamy coarse sand. Each entry was mechanically transplanted on March 25 with 20 plants per field plot and replicated three times. Fertilization consisted of 500 lbs/acre of 6-6-18 prior to transplanting and an application of 500 lbs/acre of 6-6-18 at cultivation with an additional 120 lbs/acre of 16-0-0 added as nitrate of soda.
Cultural practices, harvesting, and curing procedures were uniformly applied and followed the current University of Georgia recommendations. Data collected included yield in lbs/A, value/A in dollars, dollars per hundred weight, grade index, number of leaves/plant, plant height in inches, and days to flower. The chemical determinations consisted of total alkaloids, total soluble sugars, and the ratio of sugar to total alkaloids.
Yields (Table 1.) were average ranging from 1982 lbs/A for NC 2326 to 3667 lbs/A for K 326. The breeder's lines ranged from 2747 lbs/A for RG H61 to 3688 lbs/A for OX 414NF. Dollars per acre followed the same trend with NC 2326 at $3218/A and K 326 at $6376/A. The breeder's lines yielded $4569/A for RG H61 and a high of $6322/A for Speight 212 even though it yielded slightly less than OX 414NF. Grade indices were fairly good, ranging from 30 for NC 95 to 78 for Speight 210(unreleased). Leaf number and plant height were about normal for all entries with 30" to 36" heights and 18 leaves being the average. The spread for price per CWT ranged from $148 per CWT for NC 95 to $176 per CWT for Speight 209. The state average for 1998 was $170 per CWT and this test had 24 entries 1 to 8 dollars above and 16 entries 1 to22 dollars below with the test mean equal to the state average. Agronomic results from the 1998 Official Variety Test are summarized in Tables 1. and 2.
The Regional Farm Test is summarized in Table 3. In this test, none of the entries out weighed the NC 95 check significantly though RG 5H17 yielded 3715lbs/A as compared to 3075lbs/A for NC 95. Dollars per acre followed the same trend with NC 95 at $4715/A and RG 5H17 at $6226/A. The spread for price per CWT ranged from $154 per CWT for NC 95 to $173 per CWT for OX 6069. All entries were below the state average of $170 per CWTwith the exception of NCTG 100($172) and OX 6069($173). OX 6069 also had the highest grade index at 67 with NC 95 the lowest at 33. Leaf number and plant height were within normal ranges. Chemistry followed the same trend as the Official Variety Test.
Table 1. Yield, Value, Price Index, Grade Index and Agronomic Characteristics of Released Varieties Evaluated in the 1998 Official Flue-Cured Variety Test at the University of Georgia, Tifton, GA.
Variety |
Yield lb/A |
Value $/A |
Price1 Index $/CWT |
Grade2 Index |
Number Leaves/ Plant |
Plant Ht. (inch) |
Days to Flower |
% Total Alkaloids |
% Reducing Sugars |
Ratio RS/TA |
| NC 2326 | 1982 |
3218 |
162 |
43 |
15 |
32 |
62 |
|||
| NC 95 | 3136 |
4641 |
148 |
30 |
17 |
35 |
62 |
|||
| K326 | 3667 |
6376 |
174 |
66 |
18 |
33 |
81 |
3.48 |
9.6 |
2.76 |
| Coker 371 Gold | 2996 |
5230 |
175 |
67 |
16 |
32 |
76 |
4.47 |
8.4 |
1.88 |
| K 149 | 2986 |
5007 |
168 |
56 |
17 |
32 |
80 |
3.89 |
7.1 |
1.83 |
| K 346 | 2843 |
4835 |
170 |
54 |
18 |
35 |
81 |
4.17 |
9.0 |
2.16 |
| K 394 | 3519 |
6205 |
176 |
68 |
18 |
33 |
81 |
3.55 |
14.8 |
4.17 |
| K 730 | 2975 |
5124 |
172 |
59 |
18 |
33 |
81 |
3.78 |
12.0 |
3.17 |
| K 399 | 3429 |
5760 |
167 |
52 |
19 |
34 |
81 |
3.84 |
9.3 |
2.42 |
| K 358 | 3144 |
5287 |
168 |
51 |
17 |
32 |
64 |
3.47 |
10.1 |
2.91 |
| NC 71 | 3335 |
56657 |
170 |
54 |
18 |
32 |
80 |
3.69 |
11.3 |
3.06 |
| NC 72 | 3329 |
5802 |
174 |
65 |
18 |
34 |
68 |
3.46 |
11.1 |
3.21 |
| NC 55 | 3329 |
5619 |
169 |
49 |
20 |
33 |
81 |
3.99 |
8.5 |
2.13 |
| OX 207 | 3360 |
5829 |
174 |
61 |
18 |
34 |
78 |
3.55 |
14.5 |
4.08 |
| RG 17 | 3450 |
6052 |
176 |
70 |
19 |
33 |
78 |
3.60 |
10.5 |
2.92 |
| RG 11 | 3297 |
5560 |
168 |
55 |
18 |
34 |
76 |
4.28 |
9.3 |
2.17 |
| RG 22 | 3403 |
5886 |
173 |
64 |
18 |
32 |
78 |
3.80 |
10.3 |
2.71 |
| RG 81 | 3006 |
5091 |
169 |
53 |
17 |
32 |
79 |
4.14 |
8.5 |
2.05 |
| RG H4 | 3022 |
4995 |
165 |
44 |
17 |
32 |
78 |
4.63 |
8.9 |
2.76 |
Table 1. Yield, Value, Price Index, Grade Index and Agronomic Characteristics of Released Varieties Evaluated in the 1998 Official Flue-Cured Variety Test at the University of Georgia, Tifton, GA (Continued).
Variety |
Yield lb/A |
Value $/A |
Price1 Index $/CWT |
Grade2 Index |
Number Leaves/ Plant |
Plant Ht. (inch) |
Days to Flower |
% Total Alkaloids |
% Reducing Sugars |
Ratio RS/TA |
| Speight G-70 | 2821 |
4655 |
165 |
45 |
16 |
32 |
68 |
3.48 |
13.7 |
3.94 |
| Speight G-117 | 3025 |
5185 |
171 |
56 |
18 |
34 |
70 |
4.29 |
8.0 |
1.86 |
| Speight G-126 | 2891 |
4953 |
172 |
70 |
17 |
33 |
79 |
3.94 |
11.1 |
2.82 |
| Speight NF3 | 3102 |
5455 |
176 |
74 |
19 |
34 |
77 |
3.70 |
9.5 |
2.57 |
| Speight 168 | 3345 |
5744 |
172 |
61 |
18 |
33 |
77 |
3.81 |
11.9 |
3.12 |
| Speight 172 | 3012 |
4803 |
158 |
56 |
18 |
33 |
77 |
4.52 |
6.6 |
1.46 |
| Speight 178 | 3588 |
6302 |
175 |
66 |
18 |
31 |
80 |
4.08 |
10.4 |
2.55 |
| Speight 179 | 3039 |
5089 |
167 |
52 |
17 |
32 |
81 |
4.46 |
7.9 |
1.77 |
| Speight 206* | 3303 |
5635 |
171 |
57 |
18 |
34 |
80 |
3.63 |
10.1 |
2.78 |
| Speight 208* | 2980 |
5156 |
173 |
59 |
18 |
34 |
80 |
4.12 |
9.2 |
2.23 |
| Speight 209* | 3557 |
6260 |
176 |
69 |
16 |
33 |
72 |
3.26 |
11.0 |
3.37 |
| Speight 210* | 3356 |
5982 |
178 |
78 |
17 |
32 |
71 |
4.07 |
10.4 |
2.56 |
| Speight 211* | 3234 |
5617 |
174 |
61 |
17 |
33 |
79 |
3.20 |
12.5 |
3.91 |
| Speight 212* | 3625 |
6323 |
173 |
62 |
19 |
30 |
79 |
3.45 |
13.1 |
3.80 |
| RG H61 | 2748 |
4569 |
166 |
55 |
16 |
32 |
82 |
4.06 |
8.9 |
2.19 |
| RG H12 | 2949 |
5027 |
171 |
54 |
17 |
33 |
68 |
4.05 |
8.8 |
2.17 |
| GL 939 | 2859 |
4962 |
173 |
64 |
17 |
32 |
66 |
3.47 |
12.0 |
3.46 |
| OX 414NF | 3689 |
5981 |
160 |
54 |
19 |
35 |
NF |
3.07 |
11.8 |
3.84 |
| RG 7H13* | 3588 |
6233 |
174 |
63 |
17 |
36 |
69 |
3.53 |
11.5 |
3.26 |
Table 1. Yield, Value, Price Index, Grade Index and Agronomic Characteristics of Released Varieties Evaluated in the 1998 Official Flue-Cured Variety Test at the University of Georgia, Tifton, GA (Continued).
Variety |
Yield lb/A |
Value $/A |
Price1 Index $/CWT |
Grade2 Index |
Number Leaves/ Plant |
Plant Ht. (inch) |
Days to Flower |
% Total Alkaloids |
% Reducing Sugars |
Ratio RS/TA |
| RG 7H5 * | 3128 |
5195 |
166 |
57 |
17 |
33 |
67 |
3.80 |
9.8 |
2.58 |
| RG 7G13* | 3192 |
5274 |
165 |
45 |
17 |
34 |
79 |
4.54 |
7.9 |
1.74 |
| RG 7G57* | 3588 |
5625 |
157 |
51 |
18 |
33 |
78 |
3.98 |
10.8 |
2.71 |
| LSD | 694.6 |
1334.8 |
13.2 |
18.2 |
1Price Index based on two year average (1997-1998) prices
for U.S. government grades.
2Numerical values ranging from 1-99 for flue-cured tobacco based on equivalent
government grades - higher the number, higher the grade.
* Unreleased Variety
Table 2. Comparison of Certain Characteristics for Released Varieties Evaluated in the 1998 Official Flue-Cured Tobacco Variety Test at the University of Georgia, Tifton, GA.
Variety |
Yield lb/A |
Value $/A |
Price1 Index $/CWT |
Grade2 Index |
Number Leaves/ Plant |
Plant Height inches |
Days to Flower |
-----------------------Three Year Average 1996-1998----------------------------------- |
|||||||
| NC 2326 | 2158 |
3423 |
164 |
46 |
16 |
35 |
76 |
| NC 95 | 2451 |
3896 |
160 |
43 |
17 |
35 |
77 |
| K 326 | 3179 |
5584 |
175 |
67 |
18 |
34 |
85 |
| Coker 371 Gold | 2398 |
4187 |
174 |
66 |
17 |
33 |
80 |
| Speight G 70 | 2658 |
4559 |
171 |
53 |
17 |
34 |
80 |
| K 346 | 2415 |
4076 |
166 |
56 |
18 |
35 |
86 |
| K 394 | 2805 |
4901 |
174 |
63 |
17 |
34 |
84 |
| K 149 | 2578 4442.2 |
4442 |
172 |
61 |
19 |
35 |
83 |
| RG 11 | 2699 |
4667 |
173 |
63 |
17 |
35 |
83 |
| Speight G 126 | 2531 |
4376 |
173 |
64 |
18 |
36 |
86 |
| Speight G 117 | 2567 |
4440 |
172 |
57 |
19 |
35 |
81 |
| RG H4 | 2699 |
4619 |
171 |
58 |
17 |
34 |
84 |
| K 730 | 2696 |
4688 |
174 |
61 |
18 |
34 |
83 |
| RG 81 | 2790 |
5036 |
173 |
64 |
18 |
34 |
86 |
| OX 207 | 2913 |
4481 |
173 |
60 |
18 |
34 |
84 |
| NC 71 | 3069 |
5309 |
173 |
61 |
18 |
34 |
83 |
Variety |
Yield lb/A |
Value $/A |
Price1 Index $/CWT |
Grade2 Index |
Number Leaves/ Plant |
Plant Height (inches) |
Days to Flower |
-----------------------Three Year Average 1996-1998----------------------------------- |
|||||||
| RG 22 | 2690 |
4675 |
173 |
65 |
18 |
34 |
81 |
------------------------Two Year Average 1997-1998----------------------------------- |
|||||||
| NC 2326 | 2019 |
3263 |
162 |
39 |
15 |
34 |
72 |
| NC 95 | 2582 |
3999 |
156 |
34 |
16 |
34 |
73 |
| K 326 | 3362 |
5866 |
174 |
67 |
18 |
33 |
85 |
| Coker 371 Gold | 2576 |
4479 |
174 |
66 |
16 |
33 |
80 |
| Speight G 70 | 2894 |
4914 |
169 |
50 |
16 |
33 |
78 |
| K 346 | 2524 |
4286 |
169 |
54 |
18 |
35 |
85 |
| K 394 | 2941 |
5131 |
173 |
64 |
17 |
32 |
84 |
| K 149 | 2827 |
4824 |
170 |
59 |
18 |
34 |
84 |
| RG 11 | 2862 |
4880 |
170 |
61 |
17 |
34 |
82 |
| Speight G 126 | 2612 |
4477 |
171 |
64 |
18 |
34 |
84 |
| Speight G 117 | 2653 |
4544 |
171 |
55 |
18 |
34 |
79 |
| RG H4 | 2699 |
4539 |
168 |
53 |
16 |
32 |
84 |
| K 730 | 2901 |
5012 |
172 |
58 |
16 |
32 |
82 |
| RG 81 | 2730 |
4677 |
171 |
61 |
17 |
32 |
84 |
Variety |
Yield lb/A |
Value $/A |
Price1 Index $/CWT |
Grade2 Index |
Number Leaves/ Plant |
Plant Height (inches) |
Days to Flower |
------------------------Two Year Average 1997-1998----------------------------------- |
|||||||
| OX 207 | 2758 |
4760 |
173 |
58 |
18 |
33 |
84 |
| NC 71 | 3390 |
5810 |
171 |
56 |
18 |
34 |
82 |
| RG 22 | 2923 |
5059 |
173 |
66 |
18 |
35 |
81 |
| GL 939 | 2776 |
4829 |
174 |
63 |
18 |
34 |
75 |
| NC 55 | 3068 |
5269 |
172 |
57 |
19 |
31 |
83 |
| NC 72 | 2918 |
5066 |
173 |
62 |
18 |
35 |
76 |
| Speight NF3 | 2506 |
4330 |
172 |
63 |
19 |
35 |
83 |
| Speight 172 | 2719 |
4520 |
166 |
61 |
19 |
34 |
83 |
Conducted on an Ocilla loamy sand soil fertilized with 1000 lbs of
6-6-18 and plants spaced 20-21 inches in 44-inch rows.
1Price Index based on two-year average (1997-1998) prices for U.S. government
grades.
2Numerical values ranging from 1-99 for flue-cured tobacco based on equivalent
grades - higher the number, higher the grade.
Researched by Stevan S. LaHue and M. G. Stephenson, under project S1-71 and supported by
grants from the Georgia Tobacco Commission.
Table 3. Comparison of Certain Characteristics for Varieties Evaluated in the 1998 Regional Farm Flue Cured Tobacco Variety Test at the University of Georgia, Tifton, GA.
Variety |
Yield lb/A |
Value $/A |
Price1 Index $/CWT |
Grade2 Index |
Number Leaves/ Plant |
Plant Height (inches) |
Days to Flower |
% Total Alkaloids |
% Reducing Sugars |
Ratio RS/TA |
| NC 2326 | 2394 |
3840 |
160 |
37 |
18 |
35 |
62 |
4.6 |
7.6 |
1.65 |
| NC 95 | 3076 |
4715 |
154 |
34 |
18 |
36 |
72 |
4.4 |
9.7 |
2.20 |
| CU 468 | 3192 |
5237 |
163 |
40 |
18 |
34 |
72 |
4.1 |
11.6 |
2.84 |
| PV H03 | 3165 |
5291 |
168 |
45 |
17 |
35 |
68 |
3.7 |
7.5 |
2.04 |
| NC TG 97 | 2782 |
4650 |
167 |
47 |
19 |
34 |
81 |
3.8 |
8.4 |
2.22 |
| NC TG 100 | 3202 |
5507 |
172 |
64 |
19 |
34 |
72 |
3.5 |
10.9 |
3.09 |
| PV H09 | 2928 |
4778 |
163 |
43 |
18 |
36 |
68 |
4.4 |
5.1 |
1.17 |
| RG 4H217 | 2801 |
4683 |
167 |
47 |
17 |
32 |
63 |
3.5 |
8.9 |
2.57 |
| RG 5H17 | 3715 |
6227 |
168 |
48 |
20 |
36 |
64 |
3.8 |
8.1 |
2.09 |
| Speight 196 | 2600 |
4298 |
165 |
48 |
17 |
35 |
70 |
3.9 |
9.8 |
2.46 |
| OX 6069 | 3467 |
6021 |
173 |
67 |
19 |
34 |
80 |
4.3 |
10.1 |
2.34 |
| Speight 190 | 3657 |
6102 |
167 |
49 |
19 |
35 |
80 |
4.2 |
7.7 |
1.86 |
| PV H08 | 3604 |
6071 |
168 |
51 |
18 |
35 |
68 |
4.3 |
11.1 |
2.59 |
| CU 561 | 3271 |
5375 |
164 |
40 |
18 |
39 |
74 |
3.8 |
10.6 |
2.77 |
| LSD -0.05 | 978.5 |
1673.4 |
7.1 |
14.9 |
| Table 4. Disease Resistance of Selected Released Tobacco Varieties | ||||
| Variety | Black Shank |
Granville Wilt |
Southern Root-Knot Nematode |
Tobacco Mosaic Virus |
| Coker 319 | L |
L |
S |
S |
| Coker 371 Gold | H |
M |
S |
S |
| CU 263 | L |
L |
RES |
S |
| GL 939 | L-M |
H |
RES |
S |
| K 149 | M |
H |
RES |
S |
| K 326 | L |
M |
RES |
S |
| K 340 | M |
M |
S |
S |
| K 346 | M |
M |
RES |
S |
| K 358 | L |
H |
RES |
S |
| K 394 | M |
L |
S |
S |
| K 399 | M |
H |
RES |
S |
| K 730 | L |
H |
RES |
S |
| McNair 944 | M |
L |
S |
S |
| NC 27 NF | L |
L |
RES |
S |
| NC 37 NF | L |
L |
RES |
S |
| NC 55 | L |
L |
RES |
S (PVY, Etch) |
| NC 60 | M-H |
M |
RES |
S |
| NC 71 | H |
M |
RES |
S |
| NC 72 | H |
L |
RES |
S |
| NC 82 | M |
M |
S |
S |
| NC 95 | L |
H |
RES |
S |
| NC 567 | L |
L |
RES (Cyst) |
RES |
| NC 729 | L |
L |
S |
S |
| NC 2326 | L |
L |
S |
S |
| OX 207 | H |
H |
RES |
S |
| OX 940 | M-H |
M |
S |
S |
| RG 11 | L |
M |
RES |
S |
| RG 17 | L |
M |
RES |
S |
| RG 22 | L |
M |
RES |
S |
| RG 81 | L |
L |
RES |
S |
| RGH 4 | M |
H |
RES |
RES |
| RGH12 | M |
M |
RES |
S |
| RGH 61 | M |
L |
RES |
S |
| Speight G-28 | M |
M |
RES |
S |
| Speight G-70 | M |
M |
RES |
S |
| Speight G-108 | M |
M |
RES |
S |
| Speight G-102 | M |
L |
RES |
S |
| Speight G-111 | M |
M |
RES |
S |
| Speight G-117 | L-M |
L-M |
RES |
S |
| Speight G-126 | M |
M |
RES |
S |
| Speight G-168 | H |
H |
RES |
S |
| Speight G-172 | H |
M |
RES |
S |
| Speight G-178 | L |
H |
RES |
S |
| Speight G-179 | H |
H |
RES |
S |
| Speight G-NF3 | H |
H |
RES |
S |
| 1 L = Low to no resistance; M = Moderate to fair
resistance; H = High resistance. 2 RES = Resistant; S = Susceptible; ? = Specific Resistance Not DeterminedFUSARIUM WILT There appears to be a great variation among varieties to Fusarium wilt. However, we do not have sufficient data to make recommendations. Root-knot nematode resistant varieties may help in that root-knot tends to increase Fusarium Wilt. |
||||
| Table 5. Yield, Grade Index, Price Index and Value per Acre of the 1997-1998 Newly Available Varieties, CPES, Bowen Farm, Tifton. | ||||
| Variety | Yield |
Grade Index1 |
Price Index2 |
Value |
lb/A |
1-99 |
$/lb |
$/A |
|
| GL 939 | 2859 |
64 |
1.73 |
4962 |
| NC 71 | 3335 |
54 |
1.70 |
5665 |
| NC 72 | 3329 |
65 |
1.74 |
5802 |
| OX 207 | 3360 |
61 |
1.74 |
5829 |
| RGH 12 | 2949 |
54 |
1.71 |
5027 |
| Speight 168 | 3345 |
61 |
1.72 |
5744 |
| Speight 172 | 3012 |
56 |
1.72 |
5744 |
| Speight 178 | 3588 |
66 |
1.75 |
6302 |
| Speight 179 | 3039 |
52 |
1.67 |
5089 |
| Speight NF3 | 3102 |
74 |
1.76 |
5455 |
| K 326 | 3667 |
66 |
1.74 |
6376 |
| 1 Grade Index is a numerical value ranging from 1-99 for flue-cured tobacco based on equivalent grades - the higher the number, the higher the grade. | ||||
| 2 Price Index is based on a two-year floating average (1997-1998) prices for U.S. government grades. | ||||
| Table 6. Disease Resistance of Newly Released Tobacco Varieties | ||||
| Variety | Black Shank |
Granville Wilt |
Southern Root-Knot Nematode |
Tobacco Mosaic Virus |
| GL 939 | M |
H |
RES |
S |
| NC 71 | H |
M |
RES |
S |
| NC 72 | H |
L |
RES |
S |
| OX 207 | H |
H |
RES |
S |
| RG 81 | L |
L |
RES |
S |
| Speight 168 | H |
H |
RES |
S |
| Speight 172 | H |
M |
RES |
S |
| Speight 178 | L |
H |
RES |
S |
| Speight 179 | H |
H |
RES |
S |
| Speight NF3 | M |
H |
RES |
S |
1 L = Low to no resistance; M = Moderate to fair resistance; H = High resistance.2 RES = Resistant; S = Susceptible; ? = Specific Resistance Not Determined.Fusarium Wilt: There appears to be a great variation among varieties to Fusarium wilt. However, we do not have sufficient data to make recommendations. Root-knot nematode resistant varieties may help in that root-knot tends to increase Fusarium wilt. |
||||
| Table 7. Pedigree, Year of Release and Sponsor of Selected Varieties. | |||||
| Variety | Yr Rel.
|
Pedigree | Sponsor | ||
| Coker 371 Gold | 1986 |
(G-28X354) X (CB139XF-105)(G-28X34) X NC82 | GL |
||
| GL 939 | 1992 |
McNair 926 X 80241 [G-28X354])McNair 399 |
GL |
||
| K 149 | 1988 |
([G-28X354] X [CB-139XF-105] X [G-28X354])McNair 399 | GL |
||
| K 326 | 1981 |
McNair 225(McNair30 X NC95) | GL |
||
| K 346 | 1988 |
McNair 926 X 80241 | GL |
||
| K 358 | 1987 |
McNair 926 X 80241 | GL |
||
| K 730 | 1989 |
McNair 926 X 80241 | GL |
||
| K 394 | 1983 |
Speight G-28 X McNair 944 | GL |
||
| K 399 | 1979 |
(C-139 X C-319) X NC 95 | GL |
||
| NC 27 NF | 1985 |
(C-319 X NC TG-21) X C-319 | NC |
||
| NC 37 NF | 1987 |
(C-319 X NC TG-21) X NC 82 | NC |
||
| NC 55 | 1994 |
(K 326 X DH 1220) X (K 326 X Coker 371 Gold | NC/GL |
||
| NC 60 | 1985 |
McNair 944 X Speight G-28 | NC |
||
| NC 71 | 1995 |
F1 Hybrid | NC/RK |
||
| NC 72 | 1996 |
F1 Hybrid | NC/RK |
||
| NC 82 | 1978 |
6129 X C-319 | NC |
||
| NC 95 | 1961 |
(C-139 X Bel.4-30) X (C-139XHicks) | NC |
||
| NC 2326 | 1965 |
(Hicks X 9102)(Hicks)Hicks)Hicks) | NC |
||
| OX 207 | 1995 |
Coker 219 X K 399 | OX |
||
| OX 940 | 1992 |
(G-28 X Coker 347) X Coker 48 | OX |
||
| RG 11 | 1991 |
NC 50 X K 399 | RG |
||
| RG 17 | 1993 |
K 326 X K 399 | RG |
||
| RG 22 | 1990 |
McNair 373 X Coker 51 | RG |
||
| RG 81 | 1994 |
K 326 X K 399 | RG |
||
| RG 89 | 1992 |
K 326 X Coker 319 X Coker 411 | RG |
||
| RGH 4 | 1994 |
Hybrid | RG |
||
| RGH 12 | 1999 |
Hybrid | RG |
||
| RGH 61 | 1995 |
F1 Hybrid | RG |
||
| Speight G-70 | 1978 |
C-258 X VA 115 X G-10 | SPT |
||
| Speight G-108 | 1986 |
G-70 X G-28 | SPT |
||
| Speight G-111 | 1991 |
G-85 X G-14 | SPT |
||
| Speight G-117 | 1990 |
C-176 X G-102 | SPT |
||
| Speight G-126 | 1992 |
K 326 X G-96 | SPT |
||
| Speight G-168 | 1996 |
Coker 371G X Spt G 118 | SPT |
||
| Speight G-172 | 1996 |
Coker 371G X Spt G 126 | SPT |
||
| Speight G-178 | 1997 |
RG8 X G117 | SPT |
||
| Speight G-179 | 1997 |
C371G X SPG-28 | SPT |
||
| Speight G-NF3 | 1996 |
Speight NF 1 X NC 0007 | SPT |
||
| VA 116 | 1989 |
NC 82 X C-319 | VA |
||
| GL NC OX RK |
Gold Leaf Seed Co. N.C. Agric. Research Service N.C. Agric. Res. Service (Oxford) F. W. Rikard Seeds |
RG SPT VA |
R. G. Seed Company Speight Seed Farms Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University |
||
The University of Georgia and Ft. Valley State College, the U.S. Department of Agriculture and counties of the state cooperating. The Cooperative Extension Service offers educational programs, assistance and materials to all people without regard to race, color, national origin, age, sex or disability.
An Equal Opportunity Employer/Affirmative Action Organization Committed to a Diverse Work Force
Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 18 and June 30, 1914, The University of Georgia College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences and the U.S. Department of Agriculture cooperating.
Gale A. Buchanan, Dean and Director